63911

PAE Aviation and Technical Services, LLC

November 21, 2025Judge Hamady
OtherStatutory ComplianceQuantum / Damages

PAE Aviation and Technical Services, LLC appealed the denial of its claim for a price adjustment under FAR 52.222-43, asserting that the government failed to provide adequate and timely notice concerning the exercise of an option and a collective bargaining agreement. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board denied both motions because the record was insufficiently developed to determine whether the notices complied with FAR 22.1010.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded an indefinite quantity contract for Contract Field Team services on November 23, 2016.
  • The task order called for aircraft maintenance and related logistics services at Fresno Air National Guard Base and included Option Period II from June 30, 2023, to June 29, 2024.
  • The task order incorporated an original collective bargaining agreement effective from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2023.
  • PAE and the Union entered into a 2023 CBA effective from April 1, 2023, through March 31, 2025, requiring wage increases for various job classifications.
  • The government gave PAE preliminary notice of its intention to exercise Option Period II on May 22, 2023.
  • The government separately gave the Union a May 22, 2023, notice referring to FAR 22.1010 and a forthcoming modification.
  • Neither May 22 notice specified a date by which the government would exercise the option or issue a bilateral contract modification extending the contract.
  • PAE and the government bilaterally exercised Option Period II through Modification No. P00019 on June 27, 2023.
  • Modification No. P00019 did not include a wage determination, was silent as to incorporation of a CBA, and lacked release language.
  • PAE sent the government a copy of the 2023 CBA on July 17, 2023.
  • The government did not dispute that PAE incurred the increase in wages and fringe benefits associated with complying with the 2023 CBA.

Parties

Appellant
PAE Aviation and Technical Services, LLC
Respondent Agency
United States Air Force
Contracting Agency
United States Air Force
Contract Number
FA8108-17-D-0012
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.