63509

Science Applications International Corporation

May 27, 2025Judge McLish
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Accounting Standards (CAS)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostQuantum / DamagesPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingStatutory ComplianceDCMA InvolvedCAS at Issue

Science Applications International Corporation appealed a Defense Contract Management Agency determination that five unilateral changes to its cost accounting practices materially increased government costs. The Board held that the contracting officer did not abuse her discretion in determining materiality, denied the appeal, and directed that interest be recalculated using a different accrual method.

Material Facts

  • SAIC's contract included FAR 52.230-2, FAR 52.230-3, and FAR 52.230-6.
  • SAIC adopted eleven unilateral cost accounting practice changes effective at the beginning of fiscal year 2019.
  • SAIC held approximately 1,200 active government contracts, including 793 subject to CAS, and approximately 98 percent of its contracts were with the Federal Government.
  • SAIC submitted cost-impact proposals calculating the effects of each practice change on existing contracts using estimated costs to complete.
  • The CFAO corrected double-counting across fixed and flexibly-priced contracts, reducing the estimated government cost increase by approximately $80,000, and SAIC accepted the corrections.
  • The parties agreed on the increased-cost amounts resulting from the practice changes.
  • The CFAO determined that two changes decreased government costs, nine increased government costs, five of the increases were material, and four were immaterial.
  • The CFAO considered each of the six CAS Materiality Criteria and emphasized the absolute dollar amount, impact on government funding, and administrative processing cost.
  • SAIC's practice changes involved changes to allocations of indirect costs to final indirect pools or changes to indirect pool base amounts.
  • The CFAO issued a final decision demanding that SAIC pay $341,947 based on $286,083 in increased costs to the government plus $55,864 in compound interest through the date of the final decision.
  • The CFAO directed payment electronically or by check and stated that interest would run on payments not made within 30 days pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §7109.

Parties

Appellant
Science Applications International Corporation
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contracting Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
N00024-14-C-6301
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.