60905

Anaconda Construction Company

June 26, 2017Judge Sweet
DismissedCDA JurisdictionFailure to Prosecute / Dismissal

Anaconda Construction Company appealed the government's decision denying costs for two destroyed loaders and a settlement proposal. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to untimely filing.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded Contract No. W91B4N-12-P-5086 to ACC to operate and maintain a burn pit for solid waste at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.
  • The government terminated the contract for convenience, effective 15 October 2013.
  • ACC submitted a claim on 24 October 2013 for the cost to replace two loaders destroyed by fire, totaling $160,000.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision on the October claim on 28 October 2013, denying any funds were owed to ACC.
  • ACC submitted a settlement proposal on 7 November 2013 for $451,600, which the contracting officer intended to reject due to lack of documentation.
  • ACC submitted a revised settlement proposal within 15 days, seeking $160,000 for the loaders and $112,900 in other costs.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision on the revised settlement proposal on 26 November 2013, denying all claimed costs.
  • ACC filed a notice of appeal on 7 November 2016, more than 90 days after both final decisions.

Parties

Appellant
Anaconda Construction Company
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
Contract No. W91B4N-12-P-5086
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.