6129261828

Ken Laster Company

July 22, 2020Judge Sweet
Denied / Government PrevailedLiquidated Damages

Ken Laster Company appealed the assessment of liquidated damages for delays in completing a contract with the Army Corps of Engineers. The Board denied the appeal, finding no excusable delays.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded the 1013 Contract to Timco Blasting and Coatings, which was later modified to correct the awardee to Laster.
  • The 1013 Contract incorporated FAR Clause 52.211-12, requiring Laster to pay liquidated damages for failure to complete work on time.
  • Task Order No. 0003 required work to be completed 158 calendar days after Laster received the notice to proceed.
  • Laster received the notice to proceed on or about March 11, 2010, with an original completion date of August 16, 2010.
  • The parties extended the due date to May 22, 2011, but Laster substantially completed work on March 5, 2012, 289 days late.
  • The government assessed $91,035 in liquidated damages due to the completion date being 289 days late.

Parties

Appellant
Ken Laster Company
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa
Contract Number
W912BV-09-D-1013
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.