General Dynamics - National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
General Dynamics - National Steel and Shipbuilding Company appealed a dispute concerning whether labor and material reservations in a fixed-price ship-repair contract covered defined work or growth work. The Board denied both parties' motions for summary judgment because the disputed clauses were ambiguous and extrinsic evidence raised genuine issues of material fact.
Material Facts
- The United States Naval Sea Systems Command awarded Contract No. N00024-17-C-4426 to NASSCO for repairs and alterations during the drydocking phased maintenance availability of USS Makin Island.
- The contract was generally fixed-price and required NASSCO to perform defined work items.
- The contract also provided for reservations of labor and material at fixed rates for growth work that the government might assign in addition to the defined work.
- Work Items 21 through 26 addressed ship service diesel generators Numbers 1 through 6, D level, respectively.
- The disputed reservation clauses required 60 mandays of labor and 16,000 dollars of material to accomplish the applicable work item, as designated by the supervisor.
- The undisputed reservation clauses required 100 man days of labor and 50,000 dollars of material to accomplish additional work not already covered by the work item.
- NASSCO sought an equitable adjustment for work on Work Items 21 through 23 and 26 requiring more than the specified labor mandays or material costs.
- NASSCO identified a price workbook and contemporaneous government statements as extrinsic evidence concerning the meaning of the disputed reservation clauses.
Parties
- Appellant
- General Dynamics - National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
- Contracting Agency
- United States Naval Sea Systems Command
- Contract Number
- N00024-17-C-4426
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468August 21, 2026
- PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLCNo. 64164July 13, 2026
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028June 10, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028February 20, 2026
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026