Vectrus Systems Corporation
Vectrus Systems Corporation and the Air Force disputed whether a base operations support contract required Vectrus to perform certain Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services property-disposition services. The Board denied both parties' cross-motions for summary judgment because the omission of the relevant contract language and disputed facts concerning the parties' interpretations required further development of the record.
Material Facts
- The Air Force awarded Vectrus contract FA3002-17-C-0009 to provide base operations support services at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama.
- A prior bridge contract and other previous contracts between Vectrus and the Air Force expressly included the DLADS-function paragraph.
- The solicitation and the BOS contract did not include the DLADS-function paragraph.
- The BOS contract contained transportation-service requirements involving the movement of passengers and cargo.
- The BOS contract required Vectrus to administer property management, maintain accountability for excess and surplus property, and provide guidance concerning DLADS support.
- Vectrus stated that it had prepared substantial quantities of non-supply items and scrap for transport during calendar year 2016.
- Vectrus asserted that the Air Force had been advised that the DLADS language was absent and had agreed that it would be added back.
- The Air Force issued a letter directing Vectrus to perform the DLADS requirement and advised Vectrus to submit a request for an equitable adjustment if it believed the direction constituted a contract change.
- Vectrus submitted a certified request for an equitable adjustment asserting that the contract did not require it to receive, process, or transport non-supply line item materials to DLADS.
- The contracting officer denied Vectrus' request in full.
Parties
- Appellant
- Vectrus Systems Corporation
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA3002-17-C-0009
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Left Hand Design CorporationNo. 62458November 7, 2024
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63465May 22, 2024
- MECTS Services Joint VentureNo. 63441July 19, 2023
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 61651February 6, 2023
- Derian, Inc.No. 63283February 1, 2023
- Mills Design Group Construction and DevelopmentNo. 62432February 1, 2023
Same Year
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184December 30, 2022
- Wright Brothers, the Building Company, Eagle LLCNo. 62285December 30, 2022
- Bhayana Brothers LLCNo. 63377December 23, 2022
- GMA-AVM Joint VentureNo. 63254December 21, 2022
- Global Technical SystemsNo. 63296December 21, 2022
- Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.No. 63182December 16, 2022
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026