61651

Vectrus Systems Corporation

February 14, 2022Judge Young
OtherContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / Damages

Vectrus Systems Corporation and the Air Force disputed whether a base operations support contract required Vectrus to perform certain Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services property-disposition services. The Board denied both parties' cross-motions for summary judgment because the omission of the relevant contract language and disputed facts concerning the parties' interpretations required further development of the record.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Vectrus contract FA3002-17-C-0009 to provide base operations support services at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama.
  • A prior bridge contract and other previous contracts between Vectrus and the Air Force expressly included the DLADS-function paragraph.
  • The solicitation and the BOS contract did not include the DLADS-function paragraph.
  • The BOS contract contained transportation-service requirements involving the movement of passengers and cargo.
  • The BOS contract required Vectrus to administer property management, maintain accountability for excess and surplus property, and provide guidance concerning DLADS support.
  • Vectrus stated that it had prepared substantial quantities of non-supply items and scrap for transport during calendar year 2016.
  • Vectrus asserted that the Air Force had been advised that the DLADS language was absent and had agreed that it would be added back.
  • The Air Force issued a letter directing Vectrus to perform the DLADS requirement and advised Vectrus to submit a request for an equitable adjustment if it believed the direction constituted a contract change.
  • Vectrus submitted a certified request for an equitable adjustment asserting that the contract did not require it to receive, process, or transport non-supply line item materials to DLADS.
  • The contracting officer denied Vectrus' request in full.

Parties

Appellant
Vectrus Systems Corporation
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA3002-17-C-0009
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.