6184161862619056224162355623566235762651

BNN Logistics

August 5, 2021Judge Osterhout
Partially SustainedQuantum / DamagesStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

BNN Logistics appealed several claims against the Army regarding deductions from invoices under a National Afghan Trucking contract. The Board granted in part and denied in part the Army's motions for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations.

Material Facts

  • The Bagram Regional Contracting Center awarded Contract No. W91B4N-11-D-7005 to BNN on August 15, 2011.
  • This contract was an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Task Order contract for trucking services in Afghanistan.
  • The government applied several deductions to BNN’s invoices based on performance metrics and alleged fuel pilfering.
  • BNN submitted a certified claim for $416,491.83 on April 17, 2018, for deductions taken through the QASP from November 2011 through January 2013.
  • BNN submitted another certified claim for $15,441,941.94 on May 7, 2019, alleging improper allocation of missions under the OML process.
  • BNN submitted a third certified claim on March 27, 2020, concerning improperly imposed financial penalties for fuel pilferage and unpaid demurrage, amounting to $2,988,718.86.

Parties

Appellant
BNN Logistics
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W91B4N-11-D-7005
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.