Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd.
Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd. appealed a termination for default by the Department of the Army regarding a task order for repairs at Osan Air Base. The Board denied the appeal, affirming the validity of the termination.
Material Facts
- On August 14, 2014, the 411 CSB awarded Sungjee indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) Contract No. W91QVN-14-D-0050.
- The Army terminated the task order for default due to appellant’s failure to complete the project by the contract completion date (CCD).
- The task order included instructions regarding access to the base, stating that contractor employees must provide information for background checks.
- Sungjee submitted its preliminary and initial project schedule on August 12, 2016, which was government-approved.
- Sungjee requested a 90-day extension two months before the CCD, citing cold weather and additional work.
- The government issued a no-cost unilateral Modification No. 02 on September 21, 2017, extending the CCD to December 23, 2017.
- Sungjee continued to request extensions and admitted fault for delays due to financial problems.
- On July 19, 2018, the COR informed Sungjee it would terminate the order for default for failure to complete the project.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91QVN-14-D-0050
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184, 62119, 62980, 64137September 1, 2026
- Hydraulic International, Inc.No. 64332August 17, 2026
- Blackstone Consulting, Inc.No. 64558July 30, 2026
- Potomac Yard ContractorsNo. 63032July 7, 2026
Same Year
- Central Environmental, Inc.No. 62628December 28, 2023
- Horizon Environmental Services, Inc.No. 63428, 63463December 28, 2023
- O-Tech Solutions, LLCNo. 61898-EAJA, 62095-EAJADecember 26, 2023
- PAE Applied Technologies LLCNo. 63233December 26, 2023
- G-W Management Services, LLCNo. 63318December 26, 2023
- SOC LLCNo. 63660December 22, 2023
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- Peritia LLCNo. 64495, 64586August 20, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439July 28, 2026