62019

D&J Machinery, Inc.

April 19, 2022Judge Wilson
Denied / Government PrevailedDefective Specifications

D&J Machinery, Inc. appealed a decision regarding alleged defective contract specifications under Contract No. W912EP-15-C-0022, resulting in additional costs. The Board denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment.

Material Facts

  • The Army Corps of Engineers awarded Contract No. W912EP-15-C-0022 to D&J Machinery on September 18, 2015.
  • The contract was a firm-fixed-price contract intended to improve water deliveries within the Shark River Slough.
  • The contract specifications included performance-based elements and required government approval for certain design elements.
  • Appellant submitted a request for approval for a flowable fill concrete mixture, which the government responded to with specific requirements.
  • The government indicated an apparent failure in the formwork for flowable fill and requested corrective action from the appellant.
  • Appellant claimed that the contractual requirements for underwater placement of flowable fill were defective.
  • The government denied appellant's claim in its entirety on January 3, 2019.

Parties

Appellant
D&J Machinery, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville
Contract Number
Contract No. W912EP-15-C-0022
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.