64497

Warrior Construction Services, Inc.

August 7, 2026Judge Arnett
Denied / Government PrevailedDefective SpecificationsContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesSmall Business

Warrior Construction Services, Inc. appealed the denial of its claim for additional costs allegedly arising from defective and conflicting specifications concerning an added roadway section. The Board denied the appeal, concluding that the ambiguity was patent and that the asserted modification did not constitute a constructive change.

Material Facts

  • The solicitation sought bids for a firm fixed-price contract to repair and rebuild Route 219 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico.
  • The original drawings depicted an 18-foot-wide straight roadway section extending 0.60 mile and specified approximately 8,500 square yards of new asphalt.
  • Amendment No. 1 added an 18-foot-wide L-shaped section extending 520 feet from Route 219 to a gate and added a drawing addressing concrete turn down curbs.
  • The updated drawings retained the approximately 8,500-square-yard asphalt quantity and the construction-limits language despite adding the 520-foot section.
  • Warrior attended the site visit, acknowledged Amendment No. 1 in its bid, and submitted its bid after receiving the updated drawings.
  • Warrior later identified a discrepancy between the narrative description and drawings and proposed either a change order for additional paving or paving the 520-foot section at 18 feet wide.
  • The government initially requested a proposal for the 520-foot section at 24 feet wide, and Warrior submitted a proposal for that work.
  • The government subsequently agreed to an 18-foot width for the 520-foot side road while retaining a 24-foot width for the main road.
  • Modification No. P00002 depicted the 520-foot asphalt section at 18 feet wide and reduced the required asphalt volume for that section.
  • Warrior submitted a claim for costs arising from the 520-foot section, and the contracting officer denied the claim.

Parties

Appellant
Warrior Construction Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army
Contract Number
W911SG-25-C-A008
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.