62051

Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support

June 13, 2022Judge Witwer
DismissedGovernment-Furnished PropertyCDA Jurisdiction

This case involves an appeal by Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support regarding a government claim for the return of government-furnished property, which was dismissed as moot after the government rescinded its claim.

Material Facts

  • The Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center awarded Contract No. N00174-11-D-0004 to ETS for the fabrication, inspection, and delivery of primer cups and anvils.
  • The contract specified that the Navy would provide the production equipment and raw material required for fabrication.
  • The Navy terminated the contract for convenience on November 3, 2015, instructing ETS to return all government-furnished property.
  • ETS returned some equipment in February 2016, but the Navy determined that not all government-furnished property had been returned.
  • On April 10, 2019, the contracting officer issued a final decision asserting a claim against ETS for $21,347 for the unreturned property.
  • ETS appealed the decision and requested that it be set aside.
  • On January 23, 2021, ETS returned additional equipment, leading to the rescission of the final decision by the contracting officer in November 2021.

Parties

Appellant
Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support
Respondent Agency
Naval Surface Warfare Center
Contract Number
N00174-11-D-0004
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.