63794

HD Inc.

March 24, 2025Judge Witwer
Denied / Government PrevailedEquitable Adjustment (REA)

HD Inc. appealed for an equitable adjustment of $174,874.08 due to increased costs from a revised Collective Bargaining Agreement. The Board denied HDI's motion for summary judgment and granted the Air Force's motion, remanding the matter to determine quantum.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Contract No. FA4830-20-C-0010 to HDI for grounds maintenance services at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia.
  • The contract required HDI to provide personnel, equipment, tools, supervision, and other resources necessary to maintain the base’s landscaping.
  • The dispute concerns Option Year Two, which ran from October 2022 through September 2023.
  • HDI was bound by the predecessor contractor’s CBA during the base year of the contract.
  • The solicitation stated that if a new CBA were negotiated, the awardee could file a Request for an Equitable Adjustment (REA) to recover any increase in wages and benefits mandated under the new CBA.
  • The Air Force partially granted HDI’s REA by issuing a modification to increase the contract by $21,890.90.
  • HDI subsequently submitted an REA requesting $174,874.08 to account for wage increases.

Parties

Appellant
HD Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Air Force
Contract Number
FA4830-20-C-0010
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.