HD Inc.
HD Inc. appealed for an equitable adjustment of $174,874.08 due to increased costs from a revised Collective Bargaining Agreement. The Board denied HDI's motion for summary judgment and granted the Air Force's motion, remanding the matter to determine quantum.
Material Facts
- The Air Force awarded Contract No. FA4830-20-C-0010 to HDI for grounds maintenance services at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia.
- The contract required HDI to provide personnel, equipment, tools, supervision, and other resources necessary to maintain the base’s landscaping.
- The dispute concerns Option Year Two, which ran from October 2022 through September 2023.
- HDI was bound by the predecessor contractor’s CBA during the base year of the contract.
- The solicitation stated that if a new CBA were negotiated, the awardee could file a Request for an Equitable Adjustment (REA) to recover any increase in wages and benefits mandated under the new CBA.
- The Air Force partially granted HDI’s REA by issuing a modification to increase the contract by $21,890.90.
- HDI subsequently submitted an REA requesting $174,874.08 to account for wage increases.
Parties
- Appellant
- HD Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA4830-20-C-0010
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 63332, 63586October 1, 2025
- Planetary Science InstituteNo. 64123August 26, 2025
- Desbuild IncorporatedNo. 64278August 12, 2025
- Pontchartrain Partners, LLCNo. 63615May 19, 2025
- Frank O'Connor Inc.No. 64065May 7, 2025
- 22nd Century Technologies, Inc.No. 63529-ADRJanuary 30, 2025
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Dashti Sanat Logistics and General ContractingNo. 63643August 11, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026
- PDO Ahusaka Joint Venture LLCNo. 64490July 23, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026