622696227062425624266268062974

Parsons Government Services, Inc.

March 26, 2025Judge McLish
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Parsons Government Services, Inc. challenged the calculation of allowable rental costs after selling and leasing back its headquarters building, contending that the gain adjustment under FAR 31.205-36(b)(2) should not be capped under FAR 31.205-16(d). The Board held that the cap applies and denied all six appeals.

Material Facts

  • Parsons is a wholly owned subsidiary of Parsons Corporation, and its headquarters were located in Pasadena, California.
  • The contract provided for task orders, some fixed-price and some flexibly priced.
  • Parsons constructed the Pasadena Tower Building between 1973 and 1974 and had fully depreciated the building by December 1991, although improvements were not fully depreciated when the building was sold.
  • The parties executed an advance agreement providing for a use charge for the fully depreciated building from 1992 through 2011.
  • Parsons sold the building and other headquarters facilities to a third party in May 2011 and shortly thereafter leased the building back for a 15-year term.
  • The government had partially reimbursed Parsons for depreciation costs associated with the building and its improvements.
  • Parsons' recognized gain from the sale was capped at the difference between the building's acquisition cost and its undepreciated balance, and the resulting gain was credited to the government.
  • Parsons initially proposed annual allowable lease costs using the capped recognized gain, but later asserted that allowable costs should be calculated using the realized gain from the sale.
  • Parsons included the realized-gain calculation in its fiscal year 2018 final indirect cost rate proposal.
  • DCAA's fiscal year 2018 audit identified Parsons' change in the method for computing allowable annual lease costs.
  • The contracting officer found that the difference between the recognized gain and realized gain was unallowable.
  • Parsons sought an upward adjustment of leaseback costs for fiscal years 2014 through 2017 in a certified claim.

Parties

Appellant
Parsons Government Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
W912DY-09-D-0062
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.