Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems moved to dismiss the government's complaint concerning allegedly expressly unallowable BACN legal costs, penalties, and interest. The Board denied the motion as to counts one, three, and four, and deferred ruling on the motion concerning count two.
Material Facts
- NGMS performed the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node contract for the Air Force.
- Northrop Grumman disclosed that some NGMS employees may have mischarged portions of their time while working at an air base near Abu Dhabi.
- Northrop Grumman engaged outside counsel to investigate certain OCONUS charging practices and billed the BACN legal costs to the government.
- NGMS submitted final indirect cost proposals that were audited by DCAA.
- NGMS later informed the government that it would treat the BACN legal costs as 100% unallowable and remove them from its cost proposals for 2012 to 2016.
- Northrop Grumman and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California entered into a civil and criminal settlement.
- The settlement addressed unallowable costs incurred in connection with the investigation, defense, and corrective actions, including attorney's fees, and provided for repayment and applicable interest and penalties.
- The DACO determined that NGMS had included expressly unallowable legal costs related to the BACN criminal matter in its final indirect cost proposals.
- The DACO assessed a penalty and interest based on the amount allocated to covered contracts and reimbursed through interim billings.
Parties
- Appellant
- Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- W91QUZ-07-D-0005
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026