J&J Maintenance, Inc., d/b/a J&J Worldwide Services
J&J Maintenance, Inc. appealed a decision by the Defense Commissary Agency regarding the validity of its claim for monetary and nonmonetary relief under a contract. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss the monetary claim for lack of jurisdiction but retained jurisdiction over the nonmonetary claims.
Material Facts
- DeCA awarded J&J three task orders to perform preventative maintenance and repair services for commissary facilities.
- The task orders provided that J&J would perform preventative maintenance services on a fixed-price basis, while repairs would be compensated on a time and materials basis.
- A dispute arose regarding J&J’s invoicing for subcontracted work performed on a time and materials basis.
- J&J contended that its actual cost of materials included costs paid to subcontractors, including any markup.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision stating that J&J had not submitted a proper claim and required a sum certain for monetary claims.
- J&J's complaint requested monetary damages of $5,861.40 and declaratory relief regarding subcontractor markup and supply house invoices.
Parties
- Appellant
- J&J Maintenance, Inc., d/b/a J&J Worldwide Services
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Commissary Agency
- Contract Number
- Contract No. 47QSHA-19-D-003F
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Environet, Inc.No. 64167September 23, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026
- Vision Distributors LLCNo. 64357July 17, 2026
- KUNJ Construction CorporationNo. 63240June 12, 2026
Same Year
- Central Environmental, Inc.No. 62628December 28, 2023
- Horizon Environmental Services, Inc.No. 63428, 63463December 28, 2023
- O-Tech Solutions, LLCNo. 61898-EAJA, 62095-EAJADecember 26, 2023
- PAE Applied Technologies LLCNo. 63233December 26, 2023
- G-W Management Services, LLCNo. 63318December 26, 2023
- SOC LLCNo. 63660December 22, 2023
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026