CBCA 2658

Commonwealth Edison Company

Jul 20, 2012Judge VergilioDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingGranted

Key Facts

Appellant
Commonwealth Edison Company
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 2658
Decided
Jul 20, 2012The decision states Jul 20, 2012 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Granted
Accordingly, the Board GRANTS the appeal.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interest

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Terry Miller
Commonwealth Edison Company
Oakbrook Terrace, IL
For the respondent
Katherine M. Smyth
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,919 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 20, 2012 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Contract Disputes Act1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED: July 20, 2012

CBCA 2658

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Terry Miller of Commonwealth Edison Company, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, counsel for

Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Katherine M. Smyth, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), HYATT, and VERGILIO.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

On December 8, 2011, the Board received from Commonwealth Edison Company (contractor) a notice of appeal concerning its account, 12266-42003, with the Department of Veterans Affairs (Government), under a General Services Administration Area Wide Public Utility Contract, GS-OOP-05-BSD-0361. The contractor seeks unpaid utility usage fees which are said to have arisen from meters that recorded only a fraction of the actual usage. The contracting officer denied the claim, citing a lack of sufficient information to support the claim.

The contractor provided information as the parties engaged in discussions without formal proceedings or filings. On July 19, 2012, the Board received from the parties a joint motion for judgment on a stipulated settlement. The Government shall pay the contractor $518,970.52 in full and final resolution of this dispute. Under the agreement, each party shall ______________________________

_____________________________ ______________________________

2 CBCA 2658

be responsible for its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses incurred in the litigation. The agency is not liable for interest under the Contract Disputes Act on the agreed-upon settlement amount. The parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from the Board’s decision, and will not appeal the decision.

Decision

Accordingly, the Board GRANTS the appeal. The contractor is to receive $518,970.52.

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

We concur:

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Commonwealth Edison Company, CBCA 2658. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.