CBCA 3069

First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting W.L.L.

Apr 23, 2013Judge WaltersDEPARTMENT OF STATE
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting W.L.L.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Judge
Walters
Case number
CBCA 3069
Decided
Apr 23, 2013The decision states Apr 23, 2013 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Jones Day
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
The appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestEAJA and fees

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Peter F. Garvin, III and Grant H. Willis and Kendall A. Lucas
Jones Day
Washington, DC
For the respondent
John C. Sawyer
Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State
Rosslyn, VA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,592 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 23, 2013 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF STATE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Contract Disputes Act1
Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: April 23, 2013

CBCA 3069

FIRST KUWAITI TRADING & CONTRACTING W.L.L.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Peter F. Garvin, III, Grant H. Willis, and Kendall A. Lucas of Jones Day, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

John C. Sawyer, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges HYATT, DRUMMOND, and WALTERS.

WALTERS, Board Judge.

Appellant, First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting W.L.L. (First Kuwaiti), filed the instant appeal from a decision of a Department of State (State) contracting officer dated August 10, 2012, denying a claim by First Kuwaiti relating to two unpaid invoices for work performed for State under two contracts at the United States New Embassy Compound in Baghdad, Iraq, contract number SALMEC-06-0049, and its modifications, and contract number SALMEC-05-0020, and its modifications. The parties entered into a settlement agreement with respect to the appeal and filed with the Board a stipulation of settlement, reflecting their amicable resolution of the issues that are the subject of the appeal. The parties have jointly moved the Board to issue a judgment in favor of First Kuwaiti in the amount of $2,547,745.20, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006). Under their settlement agreement and stipulation, they have agreed that Contract Disputes Act (CDA) interest shall accrue on said judgment amount, beginning on March 23, 2012, and continuing until payment of the judgment is made, and that such interest shall be paid to First Kuwaiti together with payment of the judgment amount. First Kuwaiti has waived any other claim to interest and/or for any attorney fees and expenses incurred in connection with the appeal.

The parties, in their joint motion and under the terms of the stipulation, have agreed that neither party will seek reconsideration of, or relief from, this Board’s decision under Board Rules 26 and 27, respectively, and that neither party will appeal this Board’s decision.

Decision

The appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ stipulation of settlement, the Board awards appellant the sum of $2,547,745.20, plus CDA interest on said amount, beginning on March 23, 2012, and continuing until payment is issued. Payment is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

__________________________

RICHARD C. WALTERS

Board Judge

We concur:

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in First Kuwaiti Trading & Contracting W.L.L., CBCA 3069. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.