63286

Honeywell International, Inc.

June 7, 2023Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Accounting Standards (CAS)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostDCAA InvolvedDCMA InvolvedCAS at IssueCommercial Item

Honeywell International, Inc. sought judgment on the pleadings concerning a government claim that its treatment of interorganizational gyro transfers violated CAS 410 and its disclosed total cost input practice. The Board denied the motion, holding that the government plausibly alleged a CAS 410 violation and that factual disputes precluded judgment on the pleadings.

Material Facts

  • Honeywell has performed government contracts subject to the Cost Accounting Standards since the 1980s.
  • SGP manufactured ring laser gyros at a Minneapolis facility and transferred some gyros to Honeywell's Coons Rapids segment for incorporation into products for commercial customers.
  • SGP disclosed that it used a total cost input base.
  • When SGP transferred the gyros, it transferred the associated labor, materials, and overhead costs from SGP's allocation base to Coons Rapids, while SGP retained its G&A costs.
  • The DACO's claim alleged violations of CAS 410-40(b)(1), 410-50(d), 410-50(f), and SGP's disclosed practice of using a total cost input base.
  • DCAA prepared a rough order of magnitude used by the DACO to estimate the effect of the higher G&A rate on government contract costs.
  • The gyro costs transferred to Coons Rapids included direct costs and overhead.
  • DCAA concluded in an audit report that the gyro line was a final accumulation point in SGP's system.

Parties

Appellant
Honeywell International, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
FA8576-20-C-0001
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.