57558

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.

July 20, 2011Judge Clarke
Denied / Government PrevailedCDA JurisdictionContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. appealed a decision regarding a claim for indirect costs related to fiscal year 2003. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, affirming the validity of the claim's sum certain.

Material Facts

  • NASA awarded Contract No. NAS5-00190 to Ball Aerospace & Technology Corp. on 15 August 2000.
  • The contract included FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES (DEC 1998), defining a claim.
  • Ball Aerospace submitted its FY 2003 indirect incurred cost rate proposal on 30 June 2004.
  • The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit report questioned $1,546,598 of the indirect costs.
  • The parties negotiated indirect expense rates, and Ball Aerospace confirmed acceptance of the rates in April 2006.
  • Ball Aerospace notified the DACO of a duplicate cost inclusion in the FY 2003 rate calculation on 18 February 2007.
  • On 27 July 2010, Ball Aerospace submitted a certified claim stating a sum certain amount of $72,730.29.
  • The DACO issued a final decision denying the claim on 14 December 2010.

Parties

Appellant
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
NAS5-00190
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.