Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. appealed a decision regarding a claim for indirect costs related to fiscal year 2003. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, affirming the validity of the claim's sum certain.
Material Facts
- NASA awarded Contract No. NAS5-00190 to Ball Aerospace & Technology Corp. on 15 August 2000.
- The contract included FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES (DEC 1998), defining a claim.
- Ball Aerospace submitted its FY 2003 indirect incurred cost rate proposal on 30 June 2004.
- The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit report questioned $1,546,598 of the indirect costs.
- The parties negotiated indirect expense rates, and Ball Aerospace confirmed acceptance of the rates in April 2006.
- Ball Aerospace notified the DACO of a duplicate cost inclusion in the FY 2003 rate calculation on 18 February 2007.
- On 27 July 2010, Ball Aerospace submitted a certified claim stating a sum certain amount of $72,730.29.
- The DACO issued a final decision denying the claim on 14 December 2010.
Parties
- Appellant
- Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- NAS5-00190
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLLNo. 56758December 13, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- Sharp Electronics CorporationNo. 57583December 6, 2011
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026