57446

CME Group, Inc.

June 23, 2011Judge Clarke
DismissedCDA JurisdictionAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

CME Group, Inc. appealed the termination for convenience of its contract by the Air Force, which the Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Material Facts

  • On 1 September 2009, the Air Force awarded CME Group, Inc. a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to conduct research.
  • The estimated cost of the contract was $7,337,000 with a fixed fee of $514,000 for a total of $7,851,000.
  • The contract was incrementally funded with $1,058,000 obligated at award.
  • By Modification No. P00001, dated 7 October 2009, the Air Force added $196,193 in incremental funding.
  • By Modification No. P00003, dated 26 April 2010, the Air Force added $1,100,000 in incremental funding.
  • On 23 August 2010, DTRA informed the contracting officer that CME's contract would not be funded beyond 15 October 2010.
  • On 3 September 2010, the contracting officer notified CME to cease performance and prepare for the removal of Government-Furnished Property.
  • CME requested that the contracting officer terminate its contract for convenience, which was done on 16 September 2010.
  • CME did not submit a termination settlement claim to the contracting officer prior to filing a notice of appeal on 1 December 2010.

Parties

Appellant
CME Group, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8650-09-C-6034
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.