CME Group, Inc.
CME Group, Inc. appealed the termination for convenience of its contract by the Air Force, which the Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Material Facts
- On 1 September 2009, the Air Force awarded CME Group, Inc. a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to conduct research.
- The estimated cost of the contract was $7,337,000 with a fixed fee of $514,000 for a total of $7,851,000.
- The contract was incrementally funded with $1,058,000 obligated at award.
- By Modification No. P00001, dated 7 October 2009, the Air Force added $196,193 in incremental funding.
- By Modification No. P00003, dated 26 April 2010, the Air Force added $1,100,000 in incremental funding.
- On 23 August 2010, DTRA informed the contracting officer that CME's contract would not be funded beyond 15 October 2010.
- On 3 September 2010, the contracting officer notified CME to cease performance and prepare for the removal of Government-Furnished Property.
- CME requested that the contracting officer terminate its contract for convenience, which was done on 16 September 2010.
- CME did not submit a termination settlement claim to the contracting officer prior to filing a notice of appeal on 1 December 2010.
Parties
- Appellant
- CME Group, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8650-09-C-6034
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLLNo. 56758December 13, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- Sharp Electronics CorporationNo. 57583December 6, 2011
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026