56481

Parsons-UXB Joint Adventure

February 1, 2011Judge Thomas
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Contract InterpretationPayment / Progress Payments / Financing

Parsons-UXB Joint Venture sought reimbursement of increased Hawaii general excise taxes under a cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity Navy contract. The Board held that the claimed costs exceeded funding allotted for costs, but denied the Government's summary-judgment motion because triable issues remained concerning whether the overrun was reasonably foreseeable.

Material Facts

  • The Navy awarded the appellant a cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract for an Unexploded Ordnance Clearance Project at Kaho'olawe Island Reserve, Hawaii.
  • The contract included FAR 52.216-7, FAR 52.232-20, and FAR 52.232-22.
  • The contract provided that the Limitation of Cost and Limitation of Funds clauses applied to each task order individually.
  • The task orders expressly allocated funding between estimated costs and award fees.
  • The State of Hawaii assessed additional general excise taxes involving the joint venture and its partners.
  • The appellant informed the contracting officer of the tax dispute and provided estimates involving multiple possible settlement outcomes.
  • The GET dispute remained unresolved during contract performance and continued after performance was completed.
  • The appellant's contract cost reports provided cost and funding information but did not include the additional GET sought in the appeal.
  • The appellant submitted an invoice for additional GET costs after performance was complete.
  • The contracting officer rejected the invoice because the added contract costs were not currently in place on the contract.
  • The appellant submitted a certified claim for reimbursement of the additional GET costs.
  • The appellant's invoice, when added to prior invoices, exceeded funding allotted for costs but remained below aggregate funding for costs and award fee.

Parties

Appellant
Parsons-UXB Joint Venture
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N62742-95-D-1369
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.