56481

Parsons-UXB Joint Venture

July 22, 2011Judge Melnick
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)

Parsons-UXB Joint Venture appealed the denial of its claim for reimbursement of increased Hawaii general excise taxes, and the government moved to compel production of documents from the joint venture's Hawaii tax dispute. The Board denied the motion to compel, holding that the government had not shown a blanket waiver of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, and denied the joint venture's request for a protective order.

Material Facts

  • The joint venture consisted of Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group Inc. and UXB International, Inc.
  • The Navy awarded the joint venture a cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract for unexploded-ordinance clearance and environmental restoration at Kaho'olawe Island Reserve, Hawaii.
  • Hawaii imposed general excise taxes on gross revenues derived from business activity in Hawaii.
  • The joint venture and its partners litigated the amount of their general excise tax liability in the Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii.
  • Following a partial settlement of the Hawaii tax dispute, the joint venture sought reimbursement from the Navy for increased general excise tax liability.
  • The contracting officer rejected the invoice on the ground that it sought costs not currently in place on the contract.
  • The 6 November 2004 letter from the joint venture's tax counsel was addressed to the joint venture and a Navy representative and described the Hawaii litigation, legal issues, legal analysis, and a cost-benefit analysis.
  • The joint venture had not produced a privilege log identifying documents it claimed were protected.
  • The joint venture stated that it would produce non-privileged documents in counsel's possession.
  • The joint venture did not indicate that it intended to rely on the substance of the 2004 letter to support its claim before the Board.

Parties

Appellant
Parsons-UXB Joint Venture
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N62742-95-D-1369
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.