Honeywell International, Inc.
Honeywell International, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's determination that provisions of a Fort Dix energy-savings delivery order concerning solar renewable energy certificates were voidable. The Board denied the jurisdictional dismissal motion, granted the government's partial-summary-judgment motion to the extent stated, and denied Honeywell's cross-motion, holding that the SREC-related terms were invalid and unauthorized.
Material Facts
- The Department of Energy awarded Honeywell an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity Super ESPC covering energy-conservation services and equipment in six Mid-Atlantic states, including New Jersey.
- The Army awarded Honeywell Fort Dix Delivery Order W911 S 1-08-F-0131 under the Super ESPC for energy-conservation-measure services.
- The delivery order included installation of a solar array and based guaranteed savings and scheduled payments in part on the value of SRECs.
- The delivery order granted Honeywell transfer rights to manage the SREC transaction, including associated environmental benefits, for ten percent of achieved SREC value.
- The contracting officers possessed unlimited contracting warrants but did not believe they had specific authorization to sell personal property.
- Phase I work, including its solar array, was completed and accepted, and payments had been made toward it.
- The Phase II solar array was supplied, completed on time, and installed as required, but the government did not connect it to the base electrical grid, test it, or accept it.
- The contracting officer's final decision declared the solar-array provisions voidable because of a failure of consideration and asserted that the payment stream violated federal property-disposition and miscellaneous-receipt statutes.
Parties
- Appellant
- Honeywell International, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- United States Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W911 S 1-08-F-0131
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc.No. 63217, 64512September 1, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- Akima Range Readiness Operations, LLCNo. 64012-ADRJune 4, 2026
- Envistacom, LLCNo. 63796May 13, 2026
Same Year
- WorleyParsons International, Inc.No. 57930December 20, 2013
- TTF, L.L.C.No. 58452December 19, 2013
- Bruce E. ZoellerNo. 56578December 17, 2013
- New Iraq Ahd CompanyNo. 58800December 17, 2013
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58561, 58562, 58563, 58565, 58566, 58567December 5, 2013
- Fluor CorporationNo. 57852December 5, 2013
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026