58385

Jaynes Corporation

May 7, 2013Judge Clarke
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract Interpretation

Jaynes Corporation appealed the rejection of its proposed sprinkler pipe under Contract No. W912PL-09-C-0010, claiming entitlement to costs incurred due to the government's disapproval. The Board sustained the appeal, finding the rejection improper.

Material Facts

  • The Army Corps of Engineers awarded Contract No. W912PL-09-C-0010 to Jaynes Corporation on 26 May 2009 for the design and build of an unmanned aircraft systems operations facility.
  • The contract required that all aboveground fire sprinkler piping be Schedule 40 steel piping.
  • Jaynes submitted a transmittal of shop drawings requesting approval for sprinkler piping, which was disapproved by the government.
  • The government rejected the Allied pipe based on the belief that it did not conform to the required ASTM standards.
  • Jaynes argued that the pipe complied with the ASTM standards and submitted supporting documentation.
  • The government failed to provide a principled analysis for the rejection of the pipe.

Parties

Appellant
Jaynes Corporation
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles
Contract Number
W912PL-09-C-0010
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.