Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.
The Board denied DFAS's motion for partial summary judgment seeking repayment of the license fee associated with the RAPID software. It held that the motion asserted a government claim that was not supported by a contracting officer's written final decision, and therefore the Board lacked jurisdiction to consider it.
Material Facts
- DFAS awarded the contract for retired military and annuitant pay services to ACS Government Solutions Group, Inc., which LMSI later acquired.
- The contract contained clause H.10, requiring prior written approval before use of contractor or third-party proprietary technology and providing for a requested license at no additional cost, subject to an exception for generally commercially available software, code, or modifications.
- DFAS provided government-owned MIRORS hardware and software to the contractor as government-furnished equipment.
- LMSI replaced MIRORS with its RAPID product, which was implemented in December 2004.
- DFAS later decided not to exercise the remaining contract options and sought a transition plan so it could resume performing the pay services itself.
- The parties discussed issuing DFAS a RAPID license but were unable to agree on the license fee.
- Modification No. P00091 provided for a firm fixed-price RAPID user license, transfer of hardware and software, and a price-redetermination clause.
- LMSI did not dispute that it was paid the amounts provided by Modification No. P00091.
- The contracting officer's final decision denied LMSI's request to increase the contract price to the not-to-exceed amount and stated that the original obligated price was the final purchase price.
- No contracting officer issued a written decision demanding repayment of any part of the RAPID license fee.
Parties
- Appellant
- Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Finance & Accounting Service
- Contracting Agency
- Defense Finance & Accounting Service
- Contract Number
- MDA220-01 -D-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- WorleyParsons International, Inc.No. 57930December 20, 2013
- TTF, L.L.C.No. 58452December 19, 2013
- Bruce E. ZoellerNo. 56578December 17, 2013
- New Iraq Ahd CompanyNo. 58800December 17, 2013
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58561, 58562, 58563, 58565, 58566, 58567December 5, 2013
- Fluor CorporationNo. 57852December 5, 2013
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026