58028

Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.

February 20, 2013Judge Clarke
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract InterpretationCDA JurisdictionDCAA Involved

The Board denied DFAS's motion for partial summary judgment seeking repayment of the license fee associated with the RAPID software. It held that the motion asserted a government claim that was not supported by a contracting officer's written final decision, and therefore the Board lacked jurisdiction to consider it.

Material Facts

  • DFAS awarded the contract for retired military and annuitant pay services to ACS Government Solutions Group, Inc., which LMSI later acquired.
  • The contract contained clause H.10, requiring prior written approval before use of contractor or third-party proprietary technology and providing for a requested license at no additional cost, subject to an exception for generally commercially available software, code, or modifications.
  • DFAS provided government-owned MIRORS hardware and software to the contractor as government-furnished equipment.
  • LMSI replaced MIRORS with its RAPID product, which was implemented in December 2004.
  • DFAS later decided not to exercise the remaining contract options and sought a transition plan so it could resume performing the pay services itself.
  • The parties discussed issuing DFAS a RAPID license but were unable to agree on the license fee.
  • Modification No. P00091 provided for a firm fixed-price RAPID user license, transfer of hardware and software, and a price-redetermination clause.
  • LMSI did not dispute that it was paid the amounts provided by Modification No. P00091.
  • The contracting officer's final decision denied LMSI's request to increase the contract price to the not-to-exceed amount and stated that the original obligated price was the final purchase price.
  • No contracting officer issued a written decision demanding repayment of any part of the RAPID license fee.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Finance & Accounting Service
Contracting Agency
Defense Finance & Accounting Service
Contract Number
MDA220-01 -D-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.