57594

Raytheon Missile Systems Company

March 18, 2013Judge Clarke
Partially SustainedPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesQuantum / DamagesAuthority of Government Agents

Raytheon Missile Systems Company appealed the Navy's denial of a claim arising from an increase in the price of JP-10 fuel required for a firm-fixed-price Tomahawk missile contract. The Board held that DESC's price increase was imputable to NAVAIR and partially sustained the appeal for amounts associated with constructing and stocking a DFSP, while denying the claim insofar as the increase covered losses from other commodities and remanding quantum.

Material Facts

  • NAVAIR awarded Raytheon a firm-fixed-price contract for full-rate production of Block IV Tomahawk Cruise Missiles.
  • The contract required all AUR missiles to be fueled with new JP-10 and included FAR 52.243-1, CHANGES-FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1987).
  • Raytheon's updated proposal stated that JP-10 would be procured by Raytheon and listed a unit cost of $14.00 per gallon.
  • DESC was the Integrated Material Manager and purchasing agent for JP-10, and Raytheon was an authorized DESC customer.
  • Dixie was the only United States manufacturer and source of JP-10 available to Raytheon, and DESC would not authorize direct sales from Dixie to Raytheon.
  • DESC increased its JP-10 standard price from $13.09 per gallon to $25.00 per gallon beginning in fiscal year 2007.
  • DESC used proceeds from the $25.00 per gallon price to finance a DFSP and purchase reserve inventory owned by DESC.
  • DESC's standard-price explanation included the budgeted cost of transporting, storing, and managing the government fuel system and adjustments reflecting gains or losses of the revolving fund.
  • Raytheon paid $25.00 per gallon for JP-10 ordered during fiscal years 2007 through 2010.
  • Raytheon alleged that the price increase and the refusal to permit bulk or direct purchases caused financial damage.

Parties

Appellant
Raytheon Missile Systems Company
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
NAVAIR
Contract Number
N00019-04-C-0569
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.