57594

Raytheon Missile Systems Company

May 23, 2013Judge Clarke
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationSuperior Knowledge

Raytheon Missile Systems Company sought reconsideration of the Board's prior denial concerning the portion of a JP-10 jet-fuel price increase attributable to losses on other commodities managed by the Defense Energy Support Center. The Board reaffirmed its factual and legal analysis and denied reconsideration.

Material Facts

  • Raytheon manufactured Tomahawk Missiles under Contract No. N00019-04-C-0569.
  • The appeal involved liability for a price increase in JP-10 jet fuel used in the Tomahawk Missiles.
  • DESC Aerospace Energy issued annual pricing memoranda for the aerospace fuels it managed.
  • The pricing memoranda identified the fuels managed by DESC Aerospace Energy CBU and provided their price histories.
  • DESC published a description of its standard price.
  • Raytheon based its pricing of JP-10 on the price history for JP-10 alone.
  • Raytheon did not seek an economic price adjustment clause for JP-10 because it viewed the risk of price fluctuation as low.
  • The prior decision sustained the appeal as to the portion of the price associated with construction of a DFSP and purchase of JP-10 to stock it.
  • The prior decision denied the appeal as to the portion associated with losses experienced by DESC's Aerospace Energy CBU on other commodities.

Parties

Appellant
Raytheon Missile Systems Company
Contract Number
N00019-04-C-0569
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.