584515946559701

Nassar Group International

August 1, 2019Judge Sweet
Partially SustainedDelay / Disruption / SuspensionEquitable Adjustment (REA)

Nassar Group International appealed against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding claims for equitable adjustments due to delays and defective work. The Board denied the appellant's motions and claims related to non-government caused delays while allowing claims for government-caused delays.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded Contract No. W917PM-07-C-0085 to Nassar Group International for the design and construction of a garrison in Afghanistan.
  • The contract required the installation of insulated grounding conductors.
  • The appellant claimed entitlement to an equitable adjustment for increased costs due to various delays.
  • The government claimed that the appellant used defective concrete and failed to install ground conductors.
  • The appellant filed four motions in limine, all of which were denied except in part for the fourth motion.
  • The government conducted an inspection and noted deficiencies in the appellant's work.
  • The appellant's claim for equitable adjustment was denied by the Contracting Officer.
  • The Board found genuine issues of material fact regarding government-caused delays but not for non-government-caused delays.

Parties

Appellant
Nassar Group International
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East
Contracting Agency
Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
W917PM-07-C-0085
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.