58958589595898259038591645916559392593935941859419594205948159615596185961959653596755967659681596825968359830598635986759872598796001760024602506030960365607246083261069611236129361294613196137061837

Supreme Foodservice GmbH

November 8, 2023Judge O'Connell
Partially SustainedQuantum / Damages

Supreme Foodservice GmbH appealed multiple claims against the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) regarding a subsistence prime vendor contract, primarily contesting the application of the prior material breach doctrine. The Board granted DLA's motion for summary judgment on most claims while allowing one claim related to a separate Panama contract.

Material Facts

  • Supreme Foodservice GmbH was awarded a subsistence prime vendor contract to deliver food and related items in Afghanistan.
  • DLA moved for summary judgment on 38 appeals based on the doctrine of prior material breach due to Supreme's guilty plea to fraud.
  • The Board found that DLA had overpaid POT costs to Supreme by $397,854,788.45 and that DLA had withheld $540,832,442.70.
  • The Board determined that Supreme was entitled to the difference of $142,977,654.25.
  • The Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's decision regarding the prior material breach defense.

Parties

Appellant
Supreme Foodservice GmbH
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contract Number
SPM300-05-D-3130
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.