DynCorp International LLC
DynCorp International LLC appealed the denial of its claim for costs associated with aircraft-engine repair work, asserting that the work was chargeable to time-and-materials CLINs rather than firm-fixed-price CLINs. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment on the contract-interpretation theory and deferred consideration of the unilateral-mistake and superior-knowledge theories.
Material Facts
- DynCorp performed a Contractor Operated and Maintained Base Supply Services contract supporting safe, flyable T-6AIB Texan II aircraft.
- The 3:XXX CLINs required maintenance, repairs, overhauls, and replenishments or replacements required as a function of flight hours and were identified as firm-fixed-price.
- The 4:XXX CLINs included CLINs 4228 and 4229, which required engine overhauls and were firm-fixed-price.
- The 5XXX CLINs were entitled "OVER AND ABOVE ENGINES" and identified the work as time-and-materials.
- The contract defined repair as the restoration or replacement of material required to return it to a serviceable condition.
- The contract did not define overhaul, consumables, one-time inspection, or overhaul inspections.
- The parties disputed whether engine overhaul primarily involved repair or replacement of parts regardless of whether the parts were damaged or outside tolerances.
- The parties disputed whether on-condition work during an overhaul could be predicted before disassembly.
- The contract required off-site repair for reparable aircraft material and stated that failed parts discovered during overhaul inspections were cost per flight hour.
- The parties relied on questions and answers, letters of concern, correspondence with Pratt & Whitney, evaluation notices, and trade-practice evidence, and neither party contended that those documents were incorporated into the contract.
Parties
- Appellant
- DynCorp International LLC
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA86 l 7-12-C-6208
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026