59244

DynCorp International LLC

May 12, 2016Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationMistake / ReformationSuperior KnowledgeQuantum / Damages

DynCorp International LLC appealed the denial of its claim for payment for engine-overhaul on-condition work, contending that the work was chargeable on a time-and-materials, over-and-above basis. The Board held that the contract required the work to be included in the cost-per-flight-hour pricing and denied the appeal.

Material Facts

  • The contract supported T-6A/B Texan II aircraft at various air force bases and naval air stations.
  • The 3XXX CLINs required maintenance, repairs, overhauls, and replenishments or replacements required as a function of flight hours and were identified as firm-fixed-price cost-per-flight-hour work.
  • The 4XXX CLINs covered major time-change items, including firm-fixed-price engine-overhaul CLINs 4228 and 4229.
  • Some 5XXX CLINs were entitled "OVER AND ABOVE ENGINES" and were paid on a time-and-materials basis.
  • On-condition parts were cleaned and inspected during an overhaul and repaired or replaced if they failed the inspection criteria.
  • The government answered that components changed due to condition during a time-change item would not be over and above and would be covered in cost per flight hour or cost of overhaul.
  • The government later clarified that the usage data provided to offerors did not include depot-level data from engine overhauls.
  • DynCorp's subcontract with Pratt & Whitney Engine Services provided for on-condition work to be paid as over and above.
  • The Air Force awarded the contract to DynCorp, and the parties executed it on 1 June 2012.
  • DynCorp knew that there were gaps in the usage data but decided to submit a proposal.
  • Pratt & Whitney Engine Services had performed fourteen full overhauls of the PT6A-68 engine model and could provide pricing for overhaul work.
  • DynCorp submitted a certified claim for payment for on-condition work during the base period, which the contracting officer denied.

Parties

Appellant
DynCorp International LLC
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8617-12-C-6208
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.