Innoventor, Inc.
Innoventor, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for an equitable adjustment related to a defective specification and constructive change. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment and denied Innoventor's cross-motion.
Material Facts
- The Air Force issued Solicitation No. FA8224-11-R-0027 for the design and performance requirements to build a replacement for a Dynamic Brake Test Stand (DBTS).
- Innoventor submitted a proposal and was awarded Contract No. FA8224-11-C-0043, a $357,628 fixed-price contract.
- The contract required the new DBTS to pass tests and function at least as well as the legacy DBTS.
- Innoventor's DBTS failed the September 2013 Initial Operational Testing & Evaluation (IOT&E) with 0 of 5 Units Under Test (UUTs) passing.
- The Air Force concluded that Innoventor was not prepared and recommended a cure notice.
- Innoventor submitted a request for equitable adjustment (REA) for $893,358 due to 'instability of expectations.'
- The contracting officer denied the REA, stating that the government had not issued a modification directing a change.
Parties
- Appellant
- Innoventor, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8224-11-C-0043
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468August 21, 2026
- PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLCNo. 64164July 13, 2026
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028June 10, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028February 20, 2026
Same Year
- Columbia State Bank f/k/a Castle-Rose, Inc.No. 59531December 28, 2017
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLCNo. 61431-983December 28, 2017
- Goodwill Services, Inc.No. 61439December 27, 2017
- Suffolk Construction Company, Inc.No. 60990December 27, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60218December 21, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60221December 21, 2017
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p.A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428July 16, 2026