59903

Innoventor, Inc.

July 11, 2017Judge Sweet
Denied / Government PrevailedDefective SpecificationsContract Changes / Constructive ChangesContract Interpretation

Innoventor, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for an equitable adjustment related to a defective specification and constructive change. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment and denied Innoventor's cross-motion.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force issued Solicitation No. FA8224-11-R-0027 for the design and performance requirements to build a replacement for a Dynamic Brake Test Stand (DBTS).
  • Innoventor submitted a proposal and was awarded Contract No. FA8224-11-C-0043, a $357,628 fixed-price contract.
  • The contract required the new DBTS to pass tests and function at least as well as the legacy DBTS.
  • Innoventor's DBTS failed the September 2013 Initial Operational Testing & Evaluation (IOT&E) with 0 of 5 Units Under Test (UUTs) passing.
  • The Air Force concluded that Innoventor was not prepared and recommended a cure notice.
  • Innoventor submitted a request for equitable adjustment (REA) for $893,358 due to 'instability of expectations.'
  • The contracting officer denied the REA, stating that the government had not issued a modification directing a change.

Parties

Appellant
Innoventor, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Air Force
Contract Number
FA8224-11-C-0043
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.