60662

Parsons Government Services, Inc.

June 3, 2025Judge Woodrow
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationQuantum / DamagesSmall Business

Parsons Government Services, Inc. sought partial summary judgment on its claim that the government breached a requirements contract by awarding allegedly covered MOUT work to other contractors. The Board denied the motion because the scope of the requirements clause and numerous related factual issues required further proceedings.

Material Facts

  • PM TRASYS awarded Parsons Contract No. M67854-09-D-8000, a requirements contract, for MOUT training systems.
  • The contract's stated period of performance ran from March 2009 to March 2014.
  • The contract scope included engineering analysis, design, fabrication, and installation of non-permanent, modular, reconfigurable, and removable MOUT training systems.
  • The contract included nearly 5000 CLINs, including firm-fixed-price CLINs and time-and-material CLINs.
  • The contract incorporated FAR clause 52.216-21, REQUIREMENTS (OCT 1995), and included a $250,000 minimum-order limitation under FAR 52.216-19, ORDER LIMITATIONS (OCT 1995).
  • Parsons identified at least 26 contracts awarded to other contractors during the HS MOUT contract's performance period as allegedly diverted work.
  • The government disputed whether the allegedly diverted work fell within the HS MOUT contract's scope, including based on differences in the type of work, beneficiary, and awarding agency.
  • An internal Army investigation addressed alleged Anti-Deficiency Act violations involving the use of non-MILCON funds for construction work under the HS MOUT contract.
  • Parsons alleged that work performed under the Ahntech contract overlapped with HS MOUT CLINs.
  • The parties disputed whether the Ahntech actions were delivery orders or modifications, whether the ordering threshold applied, and whether the Ahntech work matched the HS MOUT contract's scope.

Parties

Appellant
Parsons Government Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Navy
Contracting Agency
Marine Corps System Command Program Manager for Training Systems (PM TRASYS)
Contract Number
M67854-09-D-8000
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.