61370

Supreme Foodservice GmbH

March 25, 2024Judge O'Connell
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedQuantum / DamagesAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Supreme Foodservice GmbH appealed a decision regarding the recovery of performance-based distribution fees by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). The Board granted Supreme's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ruling that DLA had released its claims related to the fraud in a prior settlement agreement.

Material Facts

  • Supreme Foodservice GmbH has been involved in extensive litigation with DLA, including 47 appeals since December 2011.
  • The contract was awarded to Supreme on June 3, 2005, to furnish and deliver food in Afghanistan.
  • Supreme's performance-based distribution fees could be adjusted based on performance ratings.
  • Supreme received various ratings over the years, with significant increases in fees based on excellent performance ratings.
  • In September 2014, Supreme pleaded guilty to major fraud against the United States.
  • Supreme agreed to pay $250 million to the United States as part of the guilty plea agreement.
  • DLA issued a final decision on October 11, 2017, seeking to recoup $49,322,986 from Supreme based on the fraud allegations.

Parties

Appellant
Supreme Foodservice GmbH
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contract Number
SPM300-05-D-3130
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.