6138761388

The Boeing Company

November 28, 2018Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationInspection / Acceptance / Warranty / Latent DefectsStatutory Compliance

The Boeing Company sought summary judgment on whether two Air Force contracts permitted it to place certain marking legends on technical data delivered with unlimited government rights. The Board denied the motion, agreeing that the proposed legends were nonconforming while concluding that the contracts' protection of Boeing's property rights could not be resolved on the existing record.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Boeing Delivery Order 0138 under Contract No. F33657-01-D-0026 for work under the F-15 Eagle Passive/Active Warning Survivability System program.
  • The Air Force awarded Boeing Contract No. FA8634-17-C-2650 for additional work under the EPAWSS program.
  • The contracts incorporated the 1995 and 2014 versions of DFARS 252.227-7013.
  • Both contracts required Boeing to deliver technical data with unlimited government rights.
  • Boeing retained ownership of the data.
  • Boeing submitted more than 50 technical data deliverables according to its complaint.
  • The government rejected or disapproved the deliverables because it contended that Boeing's marking legends were nonconforming.
  • The contracting officer directed Boeing to remove the legends at its own expense and resubmit the data.
  • Boeing's proposed legends included proprietary, third-party-disclosure, and copyright language.
  • The contracting officer concluded that the only authorized legends were those identified in DFARS 252.227-7013(f).

Parties

Appellant
The Boeing Company
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
F33657-01-D-0026; FA8634-17-C-2650
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.