6164061641616426164361708

Penna Group, LLC

August 25, 2021Judge Woodrow
Partially SustainedQuantum / DamagesCDA Jurisdiction

The ASBCA addressed multiple appeals by Penna Group, LLC regarding disputes with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers over contract claims and jurisdictional issues. The Board denied one appeal, sustained another, and dismissed a third based on jurisdictional grounds.

Material Facts

  • The contracts involved ecosystem restoration projects and construction at various sites in Texas.
  • Appellant submitted a claim for $8,216.53 alleging a latent defect due to hazardous waste, which was paid by the government.
  • A release of claims was executed by Penna-Ambreco JV as a condition of payment.
  • Appellant filed a notice of appeal for ASBCA No. 61640 on June 8, 2018, which was later withdrawn.
  • The government denied a request for additional funds based on the prior payment and release.
  • Appellant submitted a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) for $1,439,224.03 for ASBCA No. 61641, which was certified under DFARS.
  • The government responded that the REA did not constitute a claim under the CDA due to lack of proper certification.
  • The CO issued a final decision on a claim related to ASBCA No. 61643, which was not appealed.

Parties

Appellant
Penna Group, LLC
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
W9126G-09-C-0014 et al.
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.