Doubleshot, Inc.

Material Facts

• Doubleshot, Inc. moved for summary judgment, contending that the government's claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
• The contracts involved were administered by the Defense Contract Management Agency and were at least partially cost-plus-fixed-fee.
• Doubleshot's final incurred cost proposals for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 were due by August 28, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
• The contracting officer granted Doubleshot two extensions to submit the incurred cost proposals, the last of which was in April 2011.
• DCAA issued a report in April 2011 identifying major problems with Doubleshot's recordkeeping.
• On May 29, 2012, the contracting officer stated that Doubleshot's accounting system was disapproved and that there was no expectation of submitting final incurred cost proposals.
• Doubleshot submitted final incurred cost proposals on August 29, 2013, which DCAA deemed adequate for audit.
• DCAA issued an audit report on June 12, 2017, questioning various costs.
• The contracting officer issued a final decision on June 8, 2018, concluding that Doubleshot owed the government a net of $804,979.

Parties

Appellant

Doubleshot, Inc.

Contracting Agency

Defense Contract Management Agency

Contract Number

N6835-06-C-0416 et al.