62344

Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC

July 2, 2024Judge Witwer
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Quantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive ChangesDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC sought quantum following the Board’s determination that the Navy’s unilateral exercise of an award option was invalid. The Board partially sustained the appeal, allowing the questioned incurred costs, applying a nine percent profit rate rather than Fluor’s proposed sixteen percent, rejecting the Navy’s proposed offset, and awarding Fluor $9,633,889.53 plus CDA interest.

Material Facts

  • The contract provided regional base operations support at four Naval installations in the Jacksonville, Florida area.
  • The contract included a firm-fixed-price CLIN 11 and an IDIQ CLIN 12.
  • The Navy unilaterally exercised award option year 3 after modifying the award option plan.
  • Fluor performed CLIN 11 during the invalid option year while the Navy disputed its payment obligations.
  • DCAA questioned $481,862 of Fluor’s claimed incurred costs, while the Navy otherwise accepted the methodology for determining claimed incurred costs.
  • Fluor supported the questioned costs with accounting-system evidence, source documents, testimony, and proof of payment.
  • The parties had negotiated a seven percent profit rate for firm-fixed-price modifications.
  • The Navy delayed payment of invoices and did not pay all invoices in full during performance.
  • Fluor’s legal services costs were limited to contract administration rather than claim prosecution.
  • Fluor directly allocated corporate reachback services to CLIN 11 and provided timekeeping and payment evidence.
  • The arbitration award and settlement were issued or executed and paid during the invalid option year.
  • The Navy provided only a brief and unsupported explanation for its proposed “Costs to Recoup” deduction.

Parties

Appellant
Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Navy
Contracting Agency
Naval Facilities Command (NAVFAC) Southeast
Contract Number
N69450-12-D-7852
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.