Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC sought quantum following the Board’s determination that the Navy’s unilateral exercise of an award option was invalid. The Board partially sustained the appeal, allowing the questioned incurred costs, applying a nine percent profit rate rather than Fluor’s proposed sixteen percent, rejecting the Navy’s proposed offset, and awarding Fluor $9,633,889.53 plus CDA interest.
Material Facts
- The contract provided regional base operations support at four Naval installations in the Jacksonville, Florida area.
- The contract included a firm-fixed-price CLIN 11 and an IDIQ CLIN 12.
- The Navy unilaterally exercised award option year 3 after modifying the award option plan.
- Fluor performed CLIN 11 during the invalid option year while the Navy disputed its payment obligations.
- DCAA questioned $481,862 of Fluor’s claimed incurred costs, while the Navy otherwise accepted the methodology for determining claimed incurred costs.
- Fluor supported the questioned costs with accounting-system evidence, source documents, testimony, and proof of payment.
- The parties had negotiated a seven percent profit rate for firm-fixed-price modifications.
- The Navy delayed payment of invoices and did not pay all invoices in full during performance.
- Fluor’s legal services costs were limited to contract administration rather than claim prosecution.
- Fluor directly allocated corporate reachback services to CLIN 11 and provided timekeeping and payment evidence.
- The arbitration award and settlement were issued or executed and paid during the invalid option year.
- The Navy provided only a brief and unsupported explanation for its proposed “Costs to Recoup” deduction.
Parties
- Appellant
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Navy
- Contracting Agency
- Naval Facilities Command (NAVFAC) Southeast
- Contract Number
- N69450-12-D-7852
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 63332, 63586October 1, 2025
- Planetary Science InstituteNo. 64123August 26, 2025
- Desbuild IncorporatedNo. 64278August 12, 2025
- Pontchartrain Partners, LLCNo. 63615May 19, 2025
- Frank O'Connor Inc.No. 64065May 7, 2025
- HD Inc.No. 63794March 24, 2025
Same Year
- Red Bobtail TransportNo. FY24-03December 19, 2024
- Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials CompanyNo. 63739-ADRDecember 19, 2024
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 62302, 62303December 18, 2024
- A Best Services Inc.No. 63816December 12, 2024
- Asturian Group, Inc.No. 63687December 10, 2024
- US21, Inc.No. 63830December 10, 2024
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026