6255062672

Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.

March 29, 2022Judge Herzfeld
OtherCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Quantum / DamagesTermination for ConvenienceContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedCommercial Item

Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. sought recovery of subcontractor termination settlement costs after the Army Corps of Engineers terminated a task order for convenience. The Board held that Fluor plausibly pleaded entitlement to recover those costs but denied both the government's motion to dismiss and Fluor's motion for summary judgment because material factual disputes remained regarding the reasonableness and amount of the costs.

Material Facts

  • The Corps of Engineers awarded Fluor an electrical support services multiple-award task order contract with a base one-year period and four one-year option periods.
  • Fluor subcontracted with Blanchard Machinery Company to lease generators, switches, and control panels for task order requirements at an airfield in Bagram, Afghanistan.
  • The Corps issued a stop-work order and later terminated Fluor's task order for convenience.
  • The termination notice directed Fluor to settle subcontractor proposals and stated that reimbursement settlements would be governed by Part 49.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.249-1 and FAR 52.249-2, and Fluor flowed down the short-form termination for convenience provision to Blanchard.
  • Blanchard estimated generator and related equipment costs using five-year straight-line depreciation.
  • Blanchard's proposal stated that it used Internal Revenue Service depreciable lives and a straight-line method, while the record stated that Blanchard used declining-balance depreciation for federal tax purposes and did not depreciate the equipment in its accounting records other than for tax purposes.
  • DCAA questioned Blanchard's equipment depreciation, overhead, cost of money, and profit amounts in its audit of the termination settlement proposal.
  • The Corps paid Fluor the amount recommended by DCAA as allowable and denied the remaining disputed amount.
  • Fluor submitted Blanchard's termination settlement proposal as part of its own termination settlement proposal to the Corps.
  • The record did not include sufficient evidence establishing that Fluor paid the alleged settlement amount or documenting the reasonableness of the actual costs.
  • Fluor's complaint alleged a net gain from the eventual sale of the generators, but the supporting affidavit did not address that potential mitigating amount.

Parties

Appellant
Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.
Respondent Agency
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
W912BU-11-D-0003
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.