62685

Vectrus Systems Corporation

July 10, 2025Judge Woodrow
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / Damages

Vectrus Systems Corporation sought additional fixed fee under a cost-plus-fixed-fee, level-of-effort task order after the Navy ordered fewer labor hours than estimated. The Board held that the contract required payment based on actual hours performed and denied both appeals.

Material Facts

  • The FSET II contract was an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract that permitted cost-plus-fixed-fee task orders.
  • The task order was a cost-plus-fixed-fee, level-of-effort term contract for technical systems engineering support services.
  • The solicitation stated that actual contract performance could vary from the estimated labor hours and that the Government could not guarantee the estimated hours.
  • The task order estimated 333,962 labor hours for each performance period.
  • The task order specified fixed fees and fee-per-direct-labor-hour rates for the base period and option periods.
  • The task order provided that fixed fee would be paid for each direct labor hour performed by Vectrus or a subcontractor, subject to an 85 percent hold-back until final payment.
  • Clause SEA 5252.216-9122(g) addressed the circumstance in which the total specified level of effort was not provided and authorized a proportional fee reduction or continued performance without an increase in fee.
  • The Navy ordered 234,140 labor hours for the base period and 220,077 labor hours for option year 1.
  • Vectrus prepared a reduced-hours rough order of magnitude using the same methodology and percentages used for its original lump-sum fee.
  • Vectrus’s claims sought the difference between the fixed fee associated with the full estimated hours and the fee actually paid for the base period and option year 1.

Parties

Appellant
Vectrus Systems Corporation
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N00178-15-D-8477
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.