63197

Mindseeker, Inc.

August 29, 2024Judge Herzfeld
Partially SustainedEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / Damages

Mindseeker, Inc. appealed a decision by the Army regarding its request for equitable adjustment (REA) related to downtime losses and price increases. The Board partially sustained the appeal, allowing the downtime losses claim but dismissing the request for future price modifications.

Material Facts

  • Mindseeker entered a contract with the U.S. Army Health Contracting Activity to provide medical coding services.
  • Mindseeker submitted a request for price modification on November 18, 2019, seeking costs related to health and welfare increases and downtime.
  • On July 10, 2020, Mindseeker submitted a revised request for price modification, labeling it a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA).
  • Mindseeker's president communicated with the Army's contract specialist regarding the REA and provided additional information over several months.
  • The Army's branch chief issued a decision on January 24, 2022, denying Mindseeker's REA for downtime losses and price increases.

Parties

Appellant
Mindseeker, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
Contract No. W81K04-18-D-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.