6389064063

RTX Corporation

September 16, 2026Judge D'Alessandris
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA InvolvedCommercial Item

RTX Corporation appealed contracting officer decisions disallowing portions of state income tax costs included in its fiscal-year 2020 and 2021 incurred-cost submissions. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board held that income taxes incurred from recognizing capital gains triggered by a business reorganization are not unallowable taxes in connection with the reorganization, granted summary judgment for RTX, and sustained the appeals.

Material Facts

  • RTX Corporation and its predecessors and subsidiaries held government contracts in effect during 2020 and 2021.
  • Some of those contracts contained the Allowable Cost and Payment clause.
  • RTX's intermediate home offices submitted incurred-cost submissions for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
  • Portions of RTX's state income tax costs were allocated through its intermediate home offices to segments performing government contracts.
  • RTX and its predecessors completed a merger and several divestitures during the relevant period.
  • The asset sales generated capital gains that RTX recognized and reported as income for state tax purposes.
  • RTX voluntarily excluded certain state income tax attributable to commercial participation from the costs claimed through its intermediate home offices.
  • DCAA questioned portions of the state income tax costs as costs associated with reorganizations, mergers, and acquisitions.
  • DCMA issued separate contracting officer final decisions challenging portions of the state income tax costs claimed for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.
  • The parties stipulated that there were no material facts in dispute.

Parties

Appellant
RTX Corporation
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contracting Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
FA8735-20-C-0003
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.