Ashridge, Inc.
The ASBCA considered the government's partial motion to dismiss Ashridge's challenge to a termination for default. The Board dismissed four claims for failure to state a claim, denied dismissal of the excusable-delay claim for lack of jurisdiction, and stayed the appeal for 30 days to permit submission of that claim to the contracting officer.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Ashridge a contract to perform perimeter dike raising and other tasks at Jones-Oysterbed Island in Savannah Harbor, South Carolina.
- The government issued a show cause notice, held a show cause hearing, and then terminated the contract for default.
- The termination notice identified alleged failures involving the completion schedule, capability to close out the work, progress, and deficient work.
- Ashridge alleged that it was 95%, or substantially, complete with the project at the time of termination.
- Ashridge's complaint asserted wrongful termination and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
- The excusable-delay claim, including alleged weather delays, had not been submitted to the contracting officer.
- The government moved to dismiss four claims for failure to state a claim and the excusable-delay claim for lack of jurisdiction.
Parties
- Appellant
- Ashridge, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contracting Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W912HN-22-C-5004
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- GSINA-Pacific JV II LLCNo. 64564October 6, 2026
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468August 21, 2026
- PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLCNo. 64164July 13, 2026
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028June 10, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026
Same Year
- Ladgov CorporationNo. 64546October 8, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439October 8, 2026
- Xerox CorporationNo. 64019October 7, 2026
- Walsh Construction CompanyNo. 63920October 7, 2026
- Lemek, LLCNo. 64618October 7, 2026
- AECOM Technical Services, Inc.No. 63438, 63668October 6, 2026
Same Issue
- CSIC Solutions LLCNo. 64411October 6, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- Peritia LLCNo. 64495, 64586August 20, 2026