CBCA 4595

AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.

Apr 15, 2015Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 4595
Decided
Apr 15, 2015The decision states Apr 15, 2015 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Moser Rose Law Firm
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestJurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
David A. Rose
Moser Rose Law Firm
Valdosta, GA
For the respondent
Cassandra A. Walbert
Legal Service Command, Procurement Law Division East, United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security
Norfolk, VA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision3 pages, 3,491 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 15, 2015 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

4 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: April 15, 2015

CBCA 4595

AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

David A. Rose of Moser Rose Law Firm, Valdosta, GA, counsel for Appellant.

Cassandra A. Walbert, Legal Service Command, Procurement Law Division East,

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, Norfolk, VA, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GOODMAN, DRUMMOND, and LESTER.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Appellant, AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc., brought a claim against respondent, Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard, regarding amounts due under task order number HSCG47-10-J-A12001 and thereafter appealed a deemed denial of the claim to this Board, docketed as CBCA 4595. On April 7, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation and agreement for consent judgment that stated in part:

AMEC submitted a certified claim to the Government under the Contract Disputes Act in the total amount of $1,327,504.00. The parties have now negotiated and compromised and agree upon a settlement for this appeal in the amount of $600,000.00. The parties agree that $210,740.00 of this amount has already been paid from contract funds. The remaining $389,260.00 is to be paid from the United States Permanent Indefinite Judgment Fund, as authorized by 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

Upon entry of the consent judgment and in consideration of payment of the said sums by the United States of America (hereinafter the Government), the Appellant does remise, release, and discharges the Government, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from all liabilities, obligations, claims, and demands whatsoever under or arising from the said contract without exception. Therefore, the parties jointly request the entry of a consent judgment. The parties jointly request that the Board issue a decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e) and 7108(b), and this stipulation and agreement, sustaining the appeal. It is also jointly requested that the Board make a monetary award in the nature of a consent judgment to the Appellant in the amount of $600,000.00. In entering the judgment, the parties request that the Board state that $210,740.00 of the $600,000.00 has already been paid by the Government and that no interest is due on this amount. The remaining amount to be paid is $389,260.00 and interest, with such interest to accrue and be paid pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109, starting from May 16, 2014 and continuing until the date of payment.

The parties have filed certificates of finality in which they agree that they will not seek reconsideration of or relief from the Board’s decision awarding judgment and that they will not appeal the Board’s decision.

Decision

Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation and agreement for consent judgment, the Board awards the sum of $600,000, noting that $210,740 of the $600,000 has already been paid by the Government and no interest is due on this amount. The remaining amount to be paid is $389,260 with interest to accrue and be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 (2012) starting on May 16, 2014, and continuing until the date of payment, from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012).

__________________________

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

We concur:

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in AMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc., CBCA 4595. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.