Find and win work
Stay compliant
Research and case law
Agents and integrations
Read
Regulations and policy
Contracts and spending
Audit and compliance
Every Department of Justice release announcing a False Claims Act matter on a federal contract since 2009, searchable in full text, each with the fraud scheme its text supports, how it was resolved, the amount announced, and the office that announced it.
See which schemes the Department presses and where, find the cases that look like your own exposure, and read the Act itself, from treble damages to the relator's share, cited to the statute.
Department of Justice releases
2009 TO TODAY
Matters behind them
EACH COUNTED ONCE
Announced in settlements and judgments
ACROSS 662 MATTERS STATING A FIGURE
Name a whistleblower
430 QUI TAM RELEASES
Filter to one scheme and the list narrows to the matters that look like it. The cybersecurity representations scheme, for one, carries 35 releases, the first in 2022. Open a release for its resolution, amount, agencies and the Department's own words, with a link to the source.
The releases in the video are real, read from the corpus on November 5, 2026, with each contractor's name replaced by a bracketed description, and each is linked to its source on justice.gov.
01
Titles, defendants and the full body of every release, with the settlement agreements and complaints the Department attaches one click away.
02
14 fraud schemes read from each release's own words, from defective pricing and cost mischarging to small business fraud and cybersecurity.
03
A settlement the Civil Division and a U.S. Attorney's Office both announce is grouped into one matter, so a total never counts it twice.
04
The resolution, the amount the headline states, whether a whistleblower brought it, the agencies named and the Department of War components in the text.
955 releases announcing 813 matters, and $7.4 billion announced across the 662 that state a figure. The Insights tab breaks them down by year, scheme, agency, resolution and announcing office, ranks the largest resolutions, and sets the Department's own fiscal year recovery statistics beside them.
Seven kinds of conduct create liability, and the two that matter most to a contractor are presenting a false claim for payment and making a false record or statement that is material to one. The Act also reaches the reverse case, where money owed to the government is concealed rather than claimed from it.
The Act does not require an intent to defraud. Deliberate ignorance and reckless disregard are enough, which is why a compliance system that avoided asking a question is not a defense. Materiality is the second gate, and it asks whether the falsehood had a natural tendency to influence payment.
Liability is three times the government's damages plus a civil penalty for each false claim, and the penalty is adjusted for inflation by Department of Justice regulation rather than by the figures printed in the statute. A defendant that reports itself within 30 days, cooperates fully and beats any investigation can have the multiple reduced to two.
A private person may sue in the name of the United States. The complaint is filed in camera, stays under seal for at least 60 days, and is not served on the defendant until the court orders it. In that window the government decides whether to take the case over.
The share depends on whether the government took the case over: 15 to 25 percent when it did, 25 to 30 percent when it declined and the relator carried the case alone. A relator who planned the violation can have the share cut, and one convicted of it gets nothing.
An employee, contractor or agent who is fired, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed or otherwise discriminated against for lawful acts in furtherance of a case, or for efforts to stop a violation, is entitled to be made whole. The relief is specified in the statute and includes double back pay.
A court dismisses a qui tam case whose allegations were already publicly disclosed in a federal proceeding, a federal report or audit, or the news media, unless the government opposes dismissal or the relator is an original source. Several other bars close off cases the Act was never meant to carry.
Two limitation periods run in parallel and the later one controls, subject to a ten year outer wall. The United States proves every element, damages included, by a preponderance of the evidence, and a criminal fraud judgment estops the defendant from denying the same conduct here.
Before it sues, and before it elects on a sealed qui tam case, the Attorney General may compel documents, written answers and oral testimony by civil investigative demand. A contractor's first sight of a False Claims Act investigation is very often one of these.
A covered contractor must disclose credible evidence of a False Claims Act violation in writing to the agency Inspector General, with a copy to the contracting officer. A knowing failure by a principal to disclose is itself a cause for suspension and debarment, and it stays one until three years after final payment.
The Act dates from the Civil War, was weakened in 1943, and was rebuilt in 1986 into the statute that produces the settlements on this tab. Two further rounds in 2009 and 2010 widened it again and are why the current text reaches subcontractor claims and retained overpayments.
Two different things are counted here and they are never mixed. The Browse and Insights counts are announcements the Department of Justice published. The recovery figures are the Department's own fiscal year Fraud Statistics, which count settlements and judgments across every matter whether it was announced or not.
Every release, newest first, with the facets a contractor asks for: scheme, agency, resolution, qui tam, and the announcing office.
What gets alleged, the dollars behind each scheme, who announces it, the largest resolutions, and the Department's own fiscal year recovery statistics.
The U.S. Attorney's Offices behind the announcements, state by state, filterable to one scheme and linked to each office.
The Act itself: liability, knowledge and materiality, damages and penalties, qui tam procedure, the relator's share and the contractor's duty to disclose.
Where the releases come from, how each is read, what the figures count, and what the free plan opens.
From the Department of Justice's own press release stream on justice.gov, read back to January 2009. A release is kept when it announces a False Claims Act matter with a federal procurement nexus at any agency: a contract, a subcontract, a grant or a program a contractor bills. Announcements about the Department itself, such as annual summaries or personnel news, are left out.
From the release's own text, through a closed vocabulary of schemes applied when the corpus is built. It is not a classification the Department publishes, and a release can carry several schemes, so the scheme counts add up to more than the releases. A release whose text supports none of them is counted as matching no scheme rather than guessed at.
No. They are the amounts each release's headline announces, summed once per matter. A headline often rounds down and some matters state no figure at all. What the government actually recovers each fiscal year is the Department's own Fraud Statistics, which the Insights tab shows beside the corpus and never mixes with it.
Every release a U.S. Attorney's Office announced, on the office's state. 700 of the 955 releases carry a district office; the rest were announced only from Washington, by the Civil Division and the other Main Justice components. A release two offices announce is counted under both.
Yes. A free account browses every release, opens the Insights and the Guide, and searches and filters the corpus. The page you are reading shows the Insights charts without an account; listing a state's headlines from the map needs one.
No. The tab is a research record of what the Department of Justice announced and a guide to the text of the statute. Whether conduct creates False Claims Act liability, and whether and how to make a disclosure, turns on the facts; consult qualified counsel.