59561

Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company

September 16, 2015Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedAuthority of Government AgentsCDA JurisdictionDCAA Involved

Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company appealed a contracting officer's denial of a certified contract-adjustment claim. The Board denied the government's jurisdictional motion, concluding that any lack of authority to certify would constitute a defective certification and construing the appeal as filed in the name of Bell Boeing Joint Project Office.

Material Facts

  • The appeal involves five contracts to fabricate Multi-Purpose, Vertical-22 Osprey aircraft.
  • The first four contracts were awarded while Bell Helicopter and Boeing operated under a joint venture relationship, and the record contains no evidence that the contracting officer novated any contract.
  • The fifth contract was issued to Bell Boeing Joint Project Office, and the contractor signed it as issued.
  • The joint venture agreement and Strategic Alliance Agreement provided for equal sharing of work, profits, losses, and other aspects of the applicable program activity.
  • The Strategic Alliance Agreement stated that the parties intended to act as dual primes in contracts covered by the agreement.
  • Bell and Boeing issued powers of attorney authorizing specified individuals, including James Ariail, to execute certificates and perform acts necessary to exercise the granted authority.
  • The special instruction concerning the power of attorney required coordinated review by Bell and Boeing before Ariail exercised the authority.
  • Ariail certified the claim on behalf of Bell Boeing.
  • Boeing's Senior Manager for V-22 Contracts, Pricing and Estimating, told Ariail that the claim was "Good to go."
  • Both Bell and Boeing approved the filing of the notice of appeal.

Parties

Appellant
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company
Contract Number
N00019-96-C-0054; N00019-99-C-1090; N00019-05-C-0002; N00019-06-C-0292; N00019-07-C-0001
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.