Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company appealed a contracting officer's denial of a certified contract-adjustment claim. The Board denied the government's jurisdictional motion, concluding that any lack of authority to certify would constitute a defective certification and construing the appeal as filed in the name of Bell Boeing Joint Project Office.
Material Facts
- The appeal involves five contracts to fabricate Multi-Purpose, Vertical-22 Osprey aircraft.
- The first four contracts were awarded while Bell Helicopter and Boeing operated under a joint venture relationship, and the record contains no evidence that the contracting officer novated any contract.
- The fifth contract was issued to Bell Boeing Joint Project Office, and the contractor signed it as issued.
- The joint venture agreement and Strategic Alliance Agreement provided for equal sharing of work, profits, losses, and other aspects of the applicable program activity.
- The Strategic Alliance Agreement stated that the parties intended to act as dual primes in contracts covered by the agreement.
- Bell and Boeing issued powers of attorney authorizing specified individuals, including James Ariail, to execute certificates and perform acts necessary to exercise the granted authority.
- The special instruction concerning the power of attorney required coordinated review by Bell and Boeing before Ariail exercised the authority.
- Ariail certified the claim on behalf of Bell Boeing.
- Boeing's Senior Manager for V-22 Contracts, Pricing and Estimating, told Ariail that the claim was "Good to go."
- Both Bell and Boeing approved the filing of the notice of appeal.
Parties
- Appellant
- Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. and The Boeing Company
- Contract Number
- N00019-96-C-0054; N00019-99-C-1090; N00019-05-C-0002; N00019-06-C-0292; N00019-07-C-0001
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Cardinal Contracting Co., LLCNo. 62872July 30, 2026