60532

Sang Kash Company

June 11, 2019Judge Woodrow
Denied / Government PrevailedTermination for Default

Sang Kash Company appealed the Army's termination for default of its contract for bulk concrete supply after losing base access at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment and denied the appeal.

Material Facts

  • The contract was a requirements contract awarded to Sang Kash on July 8, 2015, by CENTCOM to obtain bulk concrete for Bagram Airfield.
  • The contract required Sang Kash to supply and deliver quantities of bulk concrete as requested by JTSCC, without a guaranteed minimum quantity.
  • Bilateral Modification No. P00002 added CENTCOM clause 5152.225-5916, requiring the contractor to maintain installation access eligibility.
  • On March 25, 2016, the BSG Commander revoked Sang Kash's access to Bagram Airfield.
  • The contracting officer terminated the contract for default citing violation of the mandatory eligibility for base access clause.
  • Sang Kash appealed the termination to the Board on April 13, 2016.

Parties

Appellant
Sang Kash Company
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Joint Theater Support Contracting Command
Contract Number
W91B4N-15-D-8013
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.