Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.
Centerra Group, LLC appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for reimbursement of back pay and related costs under a contract with NASA. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Material Facts
- Centerra and the government are parties to Contract No. NNA06CD65C.
- The contract was awarded on June 28, 2006, for fire protection and related services at NASA Ames Research Center.
- The contract incorporates standard FAR clauses applicable to a cost-reimbursement service contract.
- The contract includes a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that entitles the union to arbitrate grievances.
- On February 27, 2016, an arbitrator awarded the MFFA members $2,702,254 in back pay and additional amounts.
- Centerra submitted a certified claim for reimbursement under the contract in the amount of $6,184,910.13.
- The contracting officer denied Centerra's claim, stating it was premature to seek reimbursement before obtaining a final determination from DOL.
Parties
- Appellant
- Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- NASA
- Contracting Agency
- NASA
- Contract Number
- Contract No. NNA06CD65C
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 64085September 22, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Jaxon Construction, Inc.No. 64432June 24, 2026
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 63510, 64085June 16, 2026
- Eleven Bravo Group, LLCNo. 63932April 8, 2026
- Penna Group, LLCNo. 61708-ADR, 61641-ADR, 61642-ADRFebruary 20, 2026
Same Year
- AT&T Corp.No. 61868December 21, 2018
- Gilbane Federal Joint VentureNo. 61590December 21, 2018
- WIT Associates, Inc.No. 61547December 19, 2018
- Avis Industries, Inc.No. 61609December 19, 2018
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.No. 61209, 61210, 61211, 61212 61213, 61214December 19, 2018
- J.F. Brennan Co., Inc.No. 60737December 19, 2018
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026