61267

Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.

November 16, 2018Judge Woodrow
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCDA Jurisdiction

Centerra Group, LLC appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for reimbursement of back pay and related costs under a contract with NASA. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Material Facts

  • Centerra and the government are parties to Contract No. NNA06CD65C.
  • The contract was awarded on June 28, 2006, for fire protection and related services at NASA Ames Research Center.
  • The contract incorporates standard FAR clauses applicable to a cost-reimbursement service contract.
  • The contract includes a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) that entitles the union to arbitrate grievances.
  • On February 27, 2016, an arbitrator awarded the MFFA members $2,702,254 in back pay and additional amounts.
  • Centerra submitted a certified claim for reimbursement under the contract in the amount of $6,184,910.13.
  • The contracting officer denied Centerra's claim, stating it was premature to seek reimbursement before obtaining a final determination from DOL.

Parties

Appellant
Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
NASA
Contracting Agency
NASA
Contract Number
Contract No. NNA06CD65C
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.