6138761388

The Boeing Company

December 6, 2022Judge O'Connell
DismissedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

The Boeing Company appealed contracting officer final decisions concerning proprietary markings placed on non-commercial technical data delivered with unlimited rights under EPAWSS contracts. After remand from the Federal Circuit, the parties settled, and the Board dismissed the appeals with prejudice.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Boeing Delivery Order 0138 under the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Eagle TALON Contract for the Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction phase of the EPAWSS program.
  • The Air Force separately awarded Boeing a contract for the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase of the EPAWSS program.
  • Boeing submitted numerous non-commercial technical data deliverables to the Air Force with unlimited rights.
  • Boeing marked the technical data with a proprietary marking to notify third parties that Boeing retained rights in the data.
  • The Air Force issued contracting officer final decisions directing removal of the disputed legend as a nonconforming legend under DFARS 252.227-7013.
  • The Federal Circuit reversed the Board's denial of summary judgment, vacated the final decision denying Boeing's appeals, and remanded for further proceedings.
  • The parties entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement addressing the use of a permissible third-party legend and the parties' claims concerning the disputed legend.

Parties

Appellant
The Boeing Company
Respondent Agency
U.S. Department of the Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
F33657-01-D-0026
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.