Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc.
Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc. (HPA) appealed final decisions by a NASA contracting officer regarding claims for additional costs and time extensions related to construction work on the B2 Test Stand Restoration project. The Board partially sustained one appeal and denied the others.
Material Facts
- NASA awarded HPA an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity construction contract on August 3, 2012.
- HPA was awarded a task order on January 9, 2014, for the B2 Test Stand Restoration in the amount of $36,577,459.
- HPA performed an earlier contract on the B2 test stand and had access to the site for 15 months prior to the award of Work Package 3.
- HPA filed appeals on behalf of its subcontractor, Quality Iron Fabricators, Inc., and its sub-subcontractor, River City Erectors, LLC.
- The contract required HPA to weld structural steel shapes to the existing steel plates to reinforce the battleship.
- HPA submitted multiple requests for equitable adjustments (REAs) due to various construction challenges.
- NASA's contracting officer issued a final decision on March 27, 2019, denying HPA's claims beyond those paid in Modification No. 44.
Parties
- Appellant
- Harry Pepper and Associates, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Contracting Agency
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Contract Number
- Contract No. NNS14AA30T
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p.A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428July 16, 2026